Trust is not something one person builds for another. It is something two people build together, or it does not get built at all.

I had written about trust as something faculty build toward students. That is true. But I had written about it as if trust were a one-way construction project. Faculty lay the foundation. Students stand on it.

That is incomplete. And incomplete frameworks do not serve anyone well.

When a student enters a post-clinical conversation focused primarily on protecting their grade, managing how they appear to their instructor, or avoiding consequences, they bring high self-orientation to a process that requires honesty to function. And when both parties bring high self-orientation to the same table, nothing real gets built. What looks like a reflective conversation becomes a performance. What looks like accountability becomes compliance.

This semester I saw what bidirectional trust actually means -- not as a concept, but as an experience.

Read the full article...

Metacognition: What Makes Just Culture Work in Nursing Education: how students develop the capacity to self-regulate, and why it's the deciding factor in determining who can grow from mistakes versus who poses ongoing safety risks.

“An organization gains nothing from a climate in which practitioners are constantly fearful and insecure in their relationship to you. That surely is a culture without trust, and such a culture could never be a just or safe culture."

How even our best intentions can undermine student learning.

It All Begins Here